tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8028643425691313983.post3964343793062500215..comments2024-03-27T02:22:05.365+00:00Comments on Geoff's Shorts: iERA's Campaign - Coincidence, Convergence, or Copied?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10548882212024368758noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8028643425691313983.post-24673500106517626882022-02-20T08:32:36.478+00:002022-02-20T08:32:36.478+00:00Toto sites, specialized in Sport Toto Proto, are u...Toto sites, specialized in Sport Toto Proto, are usually private Toto sites. Totosites of the first generation often refer to the best sports zone with a focus on sports betting. 토토사이트 <a href="https://cragro.com/%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EB%86%80%EC%9D%B4%ED%84%B0" title="안전놀이터 도메인 추천" rel="nofollow">안전놀이터 도메인 추천</a> 안전놀이터 <br />토토사이트 사설토토 메이저사이트 안전놀이터 추천 전문가https://www.blogger.com/profile/11898993156045803825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8028643425691313983.post-8354436075354605842014-04-29T15:16:42.631+01:002014-04-29T15:16:42.631+01:00Good post! Thanks for sharing. Is this a copied wo...Good post! Thanks for sharing. Is this a copied work by a Muslim apologist seeking inspiration in Christian argument? <br /><a title="Perfect Travel consultants" href="http://www.hajjpackages.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">Perfect Travel consultants</a><br /> Perfect Travel Consultanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06344472108374907876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8028643425691313983.post-29068826282626715472013-04-05T14:43:13.183+01:002013-04-05T14:43:13.183+01:00I have to admit to a bit of difficulty getting to ...I have to admit to a bit of difficulty getting to the end of that video. Besides the repetition of 'peace be upon him' after every mention of Muhammad, I was aggravated by the very narrow scope of his argument when dealing with each possibility.<br /><br />The worst part had to be the addressing of the Deluded option. He implies that for a deluded man to act in a non-deluded way would be inconsistent. The narrow definition of deluded whereby you believe you are a messenger of god when you are not, is not the complete definition. It just describes a specific form of delusion and one which may incorporate some critical intelligence along side it which would explain Muhammad's non-opportunist approach at times.<br /><br />Regardless of that I think the similarities are very much present but I think its important to note that this instance could have been reached independently. Its, however, such a weak argument that it could only have weight for those who already believe which I think is the intent despite appearances.Pakman1983https://www.blogger.com/profile/07283752809936277901noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8028643425691313983.post-90491915349027504172013-04-01T09:20:15.955+01:002013-04-01T09:20:15.955+01:00indeed. Also, these trilemmas also assume we have ...indeed. Also, these trilemmas also assume we have enough data to make such judgments.<br /><br />i dabbled in the anti-apologetic arts a few years back. before i was mired in the pointlessness of it:<br /><br />http://maryquitecontrary.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/herschel-and-lucy-goldman/<br /><br />@jonnygibsonJonnyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01906663976170128392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8028643425691313983.post-30937000741839069922013-03-31T15:53:50.472+01:002013-03-31T15:53:50.472+01:00Geoff, it's clearly the same argument, which d...Geoff, it's clearly the same argument, which dates back to the seventeenth century in various forms. The Lewis version is stronger, since his riposte to the obvious criticism - that Jesus might have been genuinely mistaken - is that Jesus was claiming to be God, and that's not something you can be mistaken about. If you think you're God, he says, you're clearly insane if you're not telling the truth, and Jesus was not insane (he says). In the case of Muhammed, on the other hand, since he was not claiming to be God, it's possible to argue that he was honestly mistaken. So the Islamic version has much less force, although it actually matches the original Christian version. <br /><br />Lewis's version, on the other hand, suffers from one major problem that nobody who uses it ever seems to notice. It insists that the listener must be bound by absolute logic (either A, B or C). But the proposition it is attempting to prove - that Jesus was God - is completely illogical, since it actually assumes that Jesus was God and human at the same time, which is obviously impossible, and therefore should be ruled out from the start. So believers want you to follow their logic while giving themselves a free pass on their own lack of logic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com